SUERTRES LOTTO FORUM

DISCUSSION ON SUERTRES STRATEGY
 
HomePortalCalendarFAQSearchUsergroupsRegisterLog inPublications
=There's only one way to succeed in anything and that is to give everything=........."BET WHAT YOU CAN AFFORD TO LOSS... GOOD LUCK"............Getting rich is a fight; make no mistake about it. [ Happy Winning...(320-720) (854-651) (863-964) (910-610)]

Share | 
 

 Who are the Binay's

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
Admin
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 4247
Reputation : 41
Join date : 2009-07-31
Location : Metro Manila

PostSubject: JEJOMAR BINAY AND FAMILY CORRUPTION AND SCANDAL   January 19th 2016, 8:58 am

JEJOMAR BINAY AND FAMILY CORRUPTION AND SCANDAL
"please read"
1.Unexplained wealth 400 hectares Binay FARM-Rosario Batangas
2. Unexplained wealth 40 hectares Binay FARM-Bauan Batangas
3. Unexplained wealth 10 hectares Mango Orchard
4.Two condominium units Rockwell worth 30 million not on his SALN
5.Three story Mansion with Elevator in Banuyo Street,San Antonio Village and not on his SALN
6.House and lot Orbit st.Bel -Air Village and not on his SALN
7.House and Lot in Palm Village,Guadalope Viejo and not on his SALN
8.Rest House in Tali Beach,Batangas
9.Rest House in Puerto Azul,Cavite
10.Rest House in Tagaytay,Highlands
11.Rest House in Alfonso Cavite
12.Rest House in Zambales
13.Rest House in Pangasinan
14.More houses in Paranaque, Pasig, Mandaluyong and Muntinglupa
15. 600 Ghost Employee authorized by corrupt wife,Dra Elenita Binay and Amigas worth 3 million a month
16. Binay wife linked to Php72.06-M graft
A FORMER whistleblower in high-profile graft corruption controversies turned-head of government’s financial watchdog yesterday linked the wife of Vice President Jejomar Binay, an incumbent and several former Makati City officials to alleged deception in the public bidding for a Php72.06 million supply contract awarded by the city government in 2001.
17. Sandiganbayan graft case
Elenita Binay’s (and private businessmen Li Yee Shing, Jason Li and Vivian M. Edurise, and Ernesto Aspillaga’s) arraignment for graft charges was set by the Sandiganbayan’s 4th Division on January 18, 2008. Binay was charged of alleged anomalous purchase of office fixtures and furniture for the new Makati City Hall from private contractor Office Gallery International from December 1999 to February 2000, regarding the acquisitions worth P 13.25 million overpriced by P3.6 million.
18.Bogus charity Project-40 Million (sister cityhood )
19. Bogus charity Project-27 Million calamity fund to other Provinces
20. Bogus charity Project-22 Million Lakbay Aral Package
21. . Bogus charity Project-20 Million Ambulance to other Cities
22. 230 Million Infomercial in TV 2009-Present. He used the Makati Foundation Day Funds
23. 15 Million -Komiks for Vice President Campaign
24.More illegal canteen Businesses in Makati(UM,CITY HALL)
25. Security Services Company contract to the city Hall own by the Son in Law(Triforce security Agency)
26. Maintenance Services another son in Law (Red Hammer construction and Services)

‪#‎ADMIN_SHESYĎ‬
https://www.facebook.com/BisayaPaMore/photos/a.960555174017741.1073741829.959936297412962/1009961679077090/?type=3&theater
Back to top Go down
http://suertres.forumotion.com Online
Admin
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 4247
Reputation : 41
Join date : 2009-07-31
Location : Metro Manila

PostSubject: THE BINAY SYNDICATE   September 11th 2015, 1:03 pm

Back to top Go down
http://suertres.forumotion.com Online
Admin
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 4247
Reputation : 41
Join date : 2009-07-31
Location : Metro Manila

PostSubject: Re: Who are the Binay's   July 4th 2015, 6:24 pm


SOURCE:https://www.facebook.com/snngpage/photos/a.408015939281580.94826.126649087418268/862453550504481/?type=1&theater
Back to top Go down
http://suertres.forumotion.com Online
Admin
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 4247
Reputation : 41
Join date : 2009-07-31
Location : Metro Manila

PostSubject: Court freezes Binay assets   May 13th 2015, 12:14 pm

The Court of Appeals (CA) has granted a petition by the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) to freeze the bank accounts of Vice President Jejomar Binay totaling P600 million.


The 33-page order issued on May 11 also covered bank accounts of Binay’s son Makati Mayor Jejomar Erwin “Junjun” Binay Jr., his wife Elenita and his alleged dummies Gerardo Limlingan, Eduviges Baloloy, Antonio Tiu, Lily Hernandez Crystal, Carmelita Palo Galvan, Francisco Balaguer Baloloy, Bernadette Cezar Portollano, Mitzi Sedillo, Margeurite Lichnock, Melissa Gay Castañeda Limlingan, Victor Limlingan, James Lee Tiu, Pee Feng Lee, Ann Lorraine Buencamino Tiu, Frederick Dueñas Baloloy, Mario Alejo Oreta, Jose Orillaza, Daniel Subido, Man Bun Chong, Joy Mercado and Omni General Services Inc.


The order was issued in connection with the investigations being conducted by the Office of the Ombudsman on alleged irregularities in the construction of the Makati City Hall Building II, purportedly overpriced at P1.3 billion, and Makati Science High School. A copy of the order was secured by the Inquirer.


“The ex parte petition for the issuance of a frozen order is granted. A freeze order is hereby issued valid and effective immediately for a period of six months,” said the order by the CA’s First Division. It said Binay’s accounts in banks, insurance and securities companies should be frozen “wherever they may be found.”


The AMLC petition stemmed from complaints filed by Nicolas Enciso VI and Renato Bondal—former barangay (village) captains in Makati—in the Office of the Ombudsman.





Also included in the order was the bank account of whistle-blower Ernesto Mercado, Binay’s former vice mayor.


In all, the court order covers 242 banks, securities and insurance accounts of the respondents. The P600 million covered only accounts under Binay’s name. In all, the transactions conducted by Binay, his family and alleged dummies examined by AMLC totaled P16 billion since 2008.


The court said it agreed with the AMLC that there was “probable cause to believe that the individual and joint bank accounts of investments made by, and insurance policies issued” to Binay, his son and associates were “related to unlawful activities.”


The order was based on the findings of the National Statistics Office, claims by Enciso and Bondal that the parking building was overpriced by more than P1.3 billion, Mercado’s testimony in the Senate on his alleged cash deliveries to Junjun Binay and his father’s allies and purported dummies, and statements of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALNs) that showed incomes from 2007 to 2013 of the Binays to be “disproportionate to the values, frequency and complexity of their banking transactions.”


The records of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) showed probable links of entities, their directors and officers to the Vice President and his family, the court said.


Mercado’s testimony was corroborated on material points by the records of the SEC and the financial investigations conducted by the AMLC, the court said.


Limlingan, Baloloy and other persons associated with the Vice President made large and frequent transactions soon after the Senate blue ribbon subcommittee conducted hearings into Binay’s alleged shenanigans. Massive withdrawals of funds and pretermination of investments, among others, were made after the Senate began the hearings.


“Taking into consideration that the advanced state of technology of the electronic banking system allows for the closure of bank accounts or transfer of funds in a matter of seconds, the averment of the AMLC that there is an imminent danger that the funds in the subject bank accounts, investment and insurance policies will be withdrawn, transferred, concealed or otherwise disposed of is well taken,” the court said.


The results of the initial investigation conducted by the AMLC already indicate a pre-termination of investments as well as withdrawals and transfers of large amounts of funds from bank accounts sought to be frozen, it said.


“In the light of the foregoing and the sheer number of monetary instruments involved and the AMLC’s declaration that it still needs to conduct further financial investigation for the possible filing of appropriate legal actions against the respondents, we find the issuance of a freeze order, effective for a period of six months against the aforementioned bank accounts, insurance, policies and investments warranted,” the court said.
Back to top Go down
http://suertres.forumotion.com Online
Admin
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 4247
Reputation : 41
Join date : 2009-07-31
Location : Metro Manila

PostSubject: Re: Who are the Binay's   April 17th 2015, 12:04 pm

Back to top Go down
http://suertres.forumotion.com Online
Admin
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 4247
Reputation : 41
Join date : 2009-07-31
Location : Metro Manila

PostSubject: Re: Who are the Binay's   January 22nd 2015, 7:46 pm


source:https://www.facebook.com/snngpage/photos/a.408015939281580.94826.126649087418268/799244406825396/?type=1&theater
Back to top Go down
http://suertres.forumotion.com Online
Admin
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 4247
Reputation : 41
Join date : 2009-07-31
Location : Metro Manila

PostSubject: Re: Who are the Binay's   October 27th 2014, 11:53 am

Back to top Go down
http://suertres.forumotion.com Online
Admin
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 4247
Reputation : 41
Join date : 2009-07-31
Location : Metro Manila

PostSubject: Who are the Binay's   October 26th 2014, 10:19 pm






Last edited by Admin on February 27th 2015, 8:00 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
http://suertres.forumotion.com Online
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Who are the Binay's   

Back to top Go down
 
Who are the Binay's
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
SUERTRES LOTTO FORUM  :: Politics-
Jump to: